28th ANNUAL CONFERENCE
25-28 AUGUST 2026
EAST LONDON INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION CENTRE,
KUGOMPO CITY (FORMERLY EAST LONDON)

REWRITING THE AGENDA:
INTERNATIONALISATION THROUGH A GLOBAL SOUTH LENS

Programme 2026

*Provisional Programme

REGISTRATION DESK OPEN

07:30 - 16:00

Hamba Nathi ” Walk with US”
A Momentum Wellness Walk in partnership with University of Fort Hare

06:00

08:30 – 08:45  Welcome & Ice Breakers
08:45 – 09:00  Dr Normah Zondo, IEASA President 2025-2026

09:00 – 10:00  Key Insight Address
TOPIC: Internationalization meet Academic Xenophobia: institutional ambitions and the new geopolitics of higher education.
SPEAKER: Prof Jonathan Jansen
CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 1

08:30 - 10:00
OPENING PLENARY

SPONSOR SPOTLIGHT

10:00 - 10:10

Phola & Connect "Refreshment Break"

10:10 - 10:40

SPONSOR SPOTLIGHT

10:40 - 10:50

Plenary Panel, Powered By Walter Sisulu University
TOPIC:
Internationalisation Under Fire: Facts, Fear, and the Future
SPEAKERS: TBC
CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 1

10:50 - 12:00
PLENARY PANEL DISCUSSION

TOPIC: Beyond Niceness: A Global South Autoethnography of Race Talk, Microaggressions, and Epistemic Accountability for Equity-Centred Internationalisationns, and Epistemic Accountability for Equity-Centred Internationalisation
SPEAKERS:
• Melanie Drake, Auckland University of Technology

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 2

International higher education frequently frames “internationalisation through a Global South lens” in terms of equity, reciprocity, and epistemic justice. Yet these commitments are difficult to realise when professional norms of civility and “niceness” constrain how racism is named, heard, and addressed in educational institutions. This paper advances a Global South contribution to rewriting internationalisation’s agenda by examining niceness as a racialised discourse practice that can protect institutional comfort while foreclosing meaningful learning about race.

Using autoethnography as a leadership method, I analyse leadership encounters from my practice in a historically segregated South African primary school, where black learners and families raised concerns about microaggressions enacted by white teachers. The analysis draws on contemporaneous leadership records, written reflections, and anonymised accounts of meetings and follow-up actions. Across cases, teacher responses frequently followed a recognisable “nice” repertoire, including conciliatory apology, claims of misinterpretation, and semantic adjustments such as “I won’t say it like that again”, without sustained engagement with the racialised assumptions shaping classroom practice and learner experience.

Mobilising critical race theory reflexively, with explicit attention to the ethical demands of undertaking CRT work as a white leader-researcher, I argue that niceness can function as a mechanism of epistemic control. It narrows what can be said about racism, whose interpretations are treated as credible, and what forms of change become institutionally thinkable. I propose the concept of epistemic accountability as a leadership orientation that shifts equity work beyond interpersonal harmony towards practices that recognise harm, sustain difficult dialogue, and support pedagogical change.

The paper contributes a conceptual language and practice-facing analytic frame that is transferable to international higher education contexts, particularly staff learning, leadership preparation, and internationalisation of the curriculum initiatives that seek to centre Global South epistemologies while resisting the sanitisation of race talk. The paper concludes by offering a concise “niceness-to-accountability” leadership frame that supports leaders and internationalisation practitioners to move from apology and semantic adjustment towards deeper reflective learning and pedagogical change. It also outlines practical implications for designing staff learning and internationalisation of the curriculum initiatives that can hold discomfort productively while centring Global South epistemic justice commitments.

12:10 - 13:00
PARALLEL SESSION 1

TOPIC: Africa-Led Innovation and Knowledge Diplomacy: Lessons from the Innovation for African Universities Programme
SPEAKERS:
• Meekness Lunga, British Council
• George Barrett, British Council
• Thea van der Westhuizen- University of Kwazulu-Natal
• Sam Rametse, Regional Head of Programmes (SSA)- British Council

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 3

Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa in collaboration with the UK since 2021. These collaborations have been designed to prioritise shared expertise, co-creation of knowledge and meaningful engagement between institutions, recognising that sustainable and impactful internationalisation must be built on mutuality and reciprocity rather than dependency.

Through this approach, participating universities have been able to develop contextually relevant solutions while strengthening networks and collaborations within and beyond the continent. The initiative has fostered interdisciplinary teams working on innovation challenges linked to entrepreneurship, sustainable development, technology transfer and industry engagement. The session will offer reflections and lessons on how such Africa-led partnerships can contribute to reshaping international collaborations. From the conceptualisation of solutions to the setting of agendas, outlining of priorities and development of implementation strategies, this case study will highlight a shift away from traditional hierarchical North–South collaborations towards models where African universities act as drivers of knowledge creation, innovation ecosystems and international engagement.

12:10 - 13:00
PARALLEL SESSION 2

TOPIC: Building Global Bridges Through Student-Centred Internationalisation: Amplifying Student Voice and Agency
SPEAKERS:
• Thabo Dikgale, University of Mpumalanga
• Nsizwazonke Yende, University of Mpumalanga
• Vuyelwa Magagula, University of Mpumalanga

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 4

Rewriting the agenda of internationalisation, particularly to reflect the realities and knowledge systems of the Global South, requires meaningful engagement with diverse stakeholders in curriculum development. One of the stakeholder groups whose voice is often marginalised in internationalisation debates is that of students, which perpetuates unequal power dynamics, where students are perceived to be inferior actors in the curriculum development discourse. Yet students are not merely recipients of knowledge; they are potential co-producers of the curriculum and active participants in shaping the direction and purpose of higher education. In many contexts, the dominant models of internationalisation continue to reflect Eurocentric priorities and epistemologies, overlooking the experiences, perspectives, and aspirations of students in the Global South. This limitation raises questions about whose knowledge is valued and whose voices influence institutional and curriculum transformation. In South Africa, student-led activism has challenged these traditional approaches to higher education. Movements such as #FeesMustFall and #RhodesMustFall highlighted the need for curriculum transformation, equitable access to education, and the recognition of African and Global South epistemologies and Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS). These movements demonstrated that students are not passive actors, but influential agents capable of shaping institutional and national agendas and demanding more inclusive and socially responsive forms of internationalisation. Against this background, the main aim of this paper is to examine how student voices and activism contribute to rewriting the agenda of internationalisation through a Global South lens. The study employs content analysis of student statements, protest documents, institutional reports, and scholarly literature on student activism and internationalisation. The analysis is guided by Student Empowerment Theory, which emphasises the capacity of individuals and communities to influence decisions that affect their lives and environments. The findings suggest that student activism has a potential role in rewriting internationalisation models, while also advocating for more inclusive, socially relevant, and locally grounded curricula. The study recommends that higher education institutions institutionalise mechanisms that meaningfully incorporate student voices in internationalisation strategies, promote co-creation of curricula, and strengthen Global South collaborations that reflect the lived realities and aspirations of students.

12:10 - 13:00
PARALLEL SESSION 3

TOPIC: Internationalization for Local Impact: Lessons from the UEM–Boise State Collaboration
SPEAKERS:
• Bruce Gonzalo, Boise State University

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 5

Since formalizing their partnership in 2024, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane (Mozambique) and Boise State University (United States) have designed a collaboration that prioritizes local relevance, institutional strengthening, and reciprocal benefit. Rather than centering mobility as the primary indicator of success, the partnership has focused on how internationalization can advance workforce development, faculty capacity-building, curriculum expansion, and community engagement in both contexts.

This case study is informed by Samia Chasi and Savo Heleta’s (2025) response to mainstream positions regarding global citizenship education (GCE), where dominant models commodify internationalization, positioning students as consumers within a global knowledge economy. These mainstream views undermine the very realities (and consequences) of globalization such as structural inequalities and continuation of colonial legacies. In contrast, Chasi and Heleta’s critical global citizenship propose global citizenship education, as well as internationalization models, focused on political awareness and ethically grounded engagements that challenge knowledge hierarchies and advances epistemic justice.

Guided by these principles, the UEM–Boise State partnership has emphasized co-definition of priorities and shared governance. Through the Fulbright-Hays Group Projects Abroad initiative, Boise State faculty engaged in immersive academic experiences at UEM, participating in lectures and scholarly dialogue grounded in Mozambican contexts. This initiative positioned UEM as a co-producer of knowledge shaping curriculum innovation in the United States. A second initiative, supported through a U.S. IDEAS grant, prepares a cadre of faculty to co-develop academically rigorous study abroad programs aligned with UEM’s strategic priorities and Mozambique’s workforce and development needs. The emphasis is long-term institutional capacity-building rather than transactional exchange.

12:10 - 13:00
PARALLEL SESSION 4

TOPIC: Integrity Without Exclusion: Building Trust-Based Mobility Ecosystems in an Era of Immigration Crisis
SPEAKERS:
• Dingaan Booi, Cape Peninsual University of Technology
• Divinia Jithoo, Cape Peninsula University of Technology

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 6

South Africa’s Department of Home Affairs announced the identification of over 2,000 fraudulently issued study visas, linked to internal syndicates operating within the immigration system. The public framing of this revelation articulated by Minister Leon Schreiber under the authority of Cyril Ramaphosa’s Proclamation 154 of 2024 rightly underscores the imperative to restore administrative integrity. Yet it also invites a deeper interrogation: does the prevailing narrative risk reinscribing the figure of the “foreign national” as suspect, as other, and by extension, as criminal, rather than centering systemic governance failures?

This proposed panel engages critically with the tension between immigration enforcement discourse and the ethical imperatives of inclusive internationalisation. While the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) has revealed entrenched corruption describing an immigration regime treated as a “marketplace” public communication has largely emphasized visa cancellations, deportations, and prosecution. Such emphasis, absent nuanced differentiation between perpetrators and bona fide students, risks amplifying securitized framings of mobility. In doing so, it may inadvertently erode trust in South–South academic exchange and reinforce epistemic hierarchies that already marginalize Global South scholars.

Situated within the sub-theme of Inclusive and Innovative Mobility Ecosystems, this panel asks: How can higher education institutions, policymakers, and mobility practitioners recalibrate the discourse so that governance reform does not translate into xenophobic moral panic? What would it mean to design a mobility ecosystem that integrates the current visa systems, assisted verification? How can universities act as intermediaries of narrative justice advocating for systemic accountability without reproducing the criminalization of international students?
Bringing together voices from Higher Education Internationalisation leaders from all three institutional time, Trational Universities, Universities of Technology and Research-Intensive Universities, the dialogue will foreground three interventions. First, a structural reading of visa fraud as an institutional failure rather than migrant deviance. Second, the articulation of a South–South mobility compact that leverages virtual exchange and compliance mechanisms to mitigate risk. Third, the reframing of international students not as regulatory liabilities, but as co-producers of knowledge within a decolonial project of global engagement.

In rewriting the agenda through a Global South lens, this panel contends that integrity and inclusion are not mutually exclusive. Rather, sustainable internationalisation demands both systemic reform and a discursive shift away from the criminalization of mobility and toward the co-construction of equitable, innovative, and trust-based ecosystems.

12:10 - 13:00
PARALLEL SESSION 5

Hlanganani Networking Lunch “Gather Together”

13:00 - 14:00

TOPIC: Power, Equity and Knowledge Justice: Decolonising Internationalisation & Rebalancing Power
SPEAKERS:
• Precious Simba

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 2

Ubuntu as radical hospitality: Confronting academic xenophobia in South African higher education

14:00 - 14:50
PARALLEL SESSION 6

TOPIC: Pluriversal Mobility: Reframing International Student Transformation from the Global South
SPEAKERS:
• Normah Zondo, University of KwaZulu-Natal
• Lester Brian Shawa, University of KwaZulu-Natal

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 3

International student mobility is commonly evaluated through indicators such as participation rates, employability outcomes and global competitiveness. While these metrics offer institutional value, they reveal little about how mobility is lived, interpreted and negotiated by students within contexts shaped by historical inequality and epistemic hierarchy. This paper proposes an alternative reading of mobility by advancing a pluriversal lens that foregrounds lived experience, relationality and structural critique as central to understanding transformation. The purpose of this contribution is to interrogate how mobility is made meaningful in the Global South, and to position African student perspectives as foundational to rethinking internationalisation policy and practice.

Drawing on doctoral research conducted within South African higher education, the paper integrates phenomenological inquiry with decolonial and intersectional theory to explore how students experience mobility as a multidimensional process of affective, cognitive and relational transformation. The analysis reveals that transformation does not automatically result from cross-border movement; instead, it unfolds within asymmetrical knowledge geographies, institutional regimes of recognition and persistent architectures of coloniality. Students navigate mobility through embodied negotiations of legitimacy, belonging and precarity, encountering both epistemic marginalisation and spaces of growth. Their accounts illuminate subtle practices of reinterpretation, narrative reconstruction and strategic positioning that challenge universalised narratives of mobility as inherently empowering.

The content of the paper centres on the conceptualisation of pluriversal mobility as an analytic that reorients the gaze from Northern benchmarks to contextually grounded, relational and justice-oriented understandings of transformation. By foregrounding student agency as dynamic and situated, the paper challenges deficit-oriented rhetoric and reframes mobility as an experience mediated by intersecting identities, structural conditions and local meaning-making. The analysis further illustrates how Global South institutions can transcend competitive mimicry by embracing epistemic diversity, reciprocity and contextually relevant indicators of success.

The expected outcomes of this contribution are threefold. First, it offers theoretical insight that strengthens current debates on decolonising internationalisation by showing how African epistemologies can reshape the purposes and practices of mobility. Second, it provides empirical evidence that elevates student voices as legitimate sources of knowledge and highlights their role as co‑creators in the internationalisation ecosystem. Third, it presents practical considerations for institutions seeking to design more equitable, reflexive and socially just mobility frameworks that account for lived meaning, recognition and the complexities of Global South contexts.

This paper ultimately invites IEASA participants to reflect on how the value, purpose and metrics of mobility can be redefined in ways that foreground justice, recognition and pluriversal ways of knowing.

14:00 - 14:50
PARALLEL SESSION 7

TOPIC: University of Pretoria Registration Case Study: Exploring the Lived Experiences of Refugee, Asylum-Seeking, and Undocumented Students Navigating Registration Processes.
SPEAKERS:
• Danny Bokaba, University of Pretoria
• Setsipane Mokoduwe, University of Pretoria
• Arvash Sewpaul, University of Pretoria

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 4

Under the conference theme, “Rewriting the Agenda: Internationalisation Through a Global South Lens,” this session examines how internationalisation is experienced through the everyday realities of South African higher education registration systems. While global debates often focus on mobility, rankings, and partnerships, less attention is given to the administrative structures that shape access, belonging, and student wellbeing. For refugee, asylum-seeking, and undocumented students, registration processes extend beyond routine bureaucracy, often causing stress, anxiety, and precarity. Repeated documentation checks, institutional verification, and risk of exclusion highlight that internationalisation is not only a policy or mobility concern, but also a mental health and wellbeing issue embedded in institutional practice.

In South Africa, the Department of Home Affairs (DHA) operates under the Batho Pele (“People First”) principle, which emphasises dignity, access, transparency, and service. Yet registration processes frequently involve complex documentation requirements, regulatory uncertainty, and procedural rigidity, which can unintentionally undermine these principles for vulnerable international students.

This session argues that registration is not merely administrative; it is a site where legitimacy is negotiated, student agency is shaped, and wellbeing is impacted. By foregrounding lived experiences, the session advocates a more humane, student-centered approach to internationalisation in the Global South context.

Objectives:
Explore the lived experiences of refugee, asylum-seeking, and undocumented students navigating registration.

Critically reflect on how institutional systems can unintentionally reproduce exclusion.

Highlight the role of DHA in shaping student access and mobility.

Engage participants in reimagining inclusive, contextually responsive registration systems.

Promote equity, belonging, and holistic student wellbeing.

Session Structure:
Context Setting (15 min): Overview of UP registration systems and emerging student experience themes.

Mock Registration Simulation (15 min): Participants role-play registration scenarios to experience systemic friction and emotional barriers.

Lived Experience Reflections (30 min): Narratives, photographs, and videos illustrating student resilience, administrative discretion, and wellbeing impacts.

Collective Rewriting of Practice (30 min): Collaborative identification of inclusive policies and administrative innovations, producing actionable recommendations.

Intended Contribution & Expected Outcomes:
The session elevates student voice as knowledge, operationalises Global South-centred internationalisation, and demonstrates the centrality of administrative systems to equitable practices. Participants will gain:

Insight into vulnerable international students’ lived experiences.

Practical strategies for inclusive registration systems.

Tools to foster supportive institutional ecosystems.

A reframed understanding of internationalisation prioritising student wellbeing.

14:00 - 14:50
PARALLEL SESSION 8

TOPIC: Semiotics for Social Impact: Lessons from NGO Practice for Rewriting Internationalisation in South Africa
SPEAKERS:
• Jaimy-Lee Meloyer, University of the Western Cape
• Prashana Rampersad, YOMA World

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 5

The expected outcomes of the session include:
A conceptual framework linking semiotic theory, NGO practice and Global South internationalisation.
A set of communication principles grounded in South African social‑impact work that institutions can adapt to make internationalisation more inclusive and locally resonant.
Practical recommendations for integrating community‑based communication, participatory approaches and multimodal engagement into internationalisation strategies, curricula and student support services.

Overall, the contribution aims to reposition semiotics as a tool not only for analysing meaning, but for designing internationalisation models that reflect the lived realities, cultural identities and social aspirations of South African students and communities

14:00 - 14:50
PARALLEL SESSION 9

TOPIC: Allyship for Higher Education Internationalisation: Countering Xenophobic Narratives in South Africa
SPEAKERS:
• Darla Deardorff: UNESCO Chair on Intercultural Competence
• Werner de Wit, Stellenbosch University
• Precious Simba, Stellenbosch University
• Divinia Jithoo, Cape Peninsual University of Technology

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 6

South African higher education is entering a fraught period in which public discourse about internationalisation is increasingly shaped by xenophobic and securitised framings of mobility, staffing, and knowledge exchange. Recent statements from the parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training have criticised universities for the inclusion of international staff and asserted that internationalisation should not serve as an “excuse” to employ academics from outside South Africa. At the same time, the Department of Home Affairs has signalled a tightening stance toward international students and staff, with claims circulating that international academics “run” academic departments and that international doctoral candidates displace local students. These narratives are frequently advanced without transparent evidence, despite indications that international student numbers in South Africa are declining. The result is a policy atmosphere that normalises suspicion toward international colleagues and students, erodes institutional autonomy, and risks undermining the academic project itself: collaborative knowledge production across borders, languages, and lived experience.

This proposed panel, convened by the UNESCO Chair for Intercultural Competence, responds to the urgent need for universities to counter misinformation and reframe internationalisation as a public good grounded in evidence, ethics, and social cohesion. The panel introduces a new frame of allyship for higher education internationalisation: a practice-oriented approach that recognises asymmetries of power in global knowledge systems while refusing the scapegoating of international staff and students as a shortcut for addressing genuine structural pressures in the sector. Allyship is positioned not as a branding exercise, but as an institutional stance that combines rigorous data practice, intercultural competence, and principled advocacy within and beyond the university.

Drawing on intercultural competence scholarship and contemporary debates on migration governance, the panel will examine three interconnected questions:
• How do government and public narratives about “foreignness” enter higher education policy and campus climate, and what are their measurable effects on belonging, safety, and academic freedom?
• What forms of institutional evidence are needed to correct misleading claims about staffing and doctoral access, and how can universities communicate these findings credibly to the public and policymakers?
• What does allyship look like in practice for senior leaders, international offices, HR units, academic departments, and student support services when xenophobia becomes institutionalised through administrative processes?

The session will produce actionable outcomes for IEASA members: a shared set of narrative principles for responsible public communication on internationalisation; an outline for an institutional “evidence pack” (core indicators, definitions, and reporting templates) to strengthen sector-wide accountability; and a draft universities’ commitment statement on allyship and intercultural competence that can be adapted locally. By repositioning internationalisation away from a contested exception and toward an equitable, evidence-led contribution to national development, this panel aims to strengthen social solidarity on campus, protect academic collaboration, and support a higher education sector capable of engaging the world without compromising South Africa’s commitments to dignity, inclusion, and knowledge justice.

14:00 - 14:50
PARALLEL SESSION 10

TOPIC: Designing AI-Enabled Digital Internationalisation: A Case Study from Zimbabwean Higher Education
SPEAKERS:
• Ntando Sipho Sibanda, Women’s University in Africa
• Sam Takavarasha, Women’s University in Africa
• Jeremiah Musariwa, Women’s University in Africa

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 2

This case study examines how selected Zimbabwean higher education institutions are intentionally designing AI-enabled digital internationalisation models as context-responsive alternatives to traditional, mobility-centric approaches. Faced with persistent funding constraints, limited opportunities for physical mobility, and asymmetrical Global North–dominated partnerships, these institutions have increasingly adopted artificial intelligence (AI) and digital platforms to sustain and reconfigure their international engagement.

The purpose of the case study is to document and analyse how AI-supported teaching and assessment, virtual exchange programmes, and digitally mediated research collaboration are being operationalised to expand access, enhance inclusivity, and support sustainable internationalisation in resource-constrained contexts. Using a Global South epistemic lens, the study foregrounds institutional agency and innovation rather than deficit-based narratives of adaptation.

The content of the session draws on institutional practices across selected Zimbabwean universities, highlighting strategic choices, implementation pathways, and governance considerations. It explores how digital internationalisation initiatives have enabled broader student participation beyond elite mobility cohorts, strengthened South–South academic networks, and reduced dependence on externally driven prestige economies. Particular attention is paid to how AI tools are used to support co-teaching, learning analytics, and collaborative research, while remaining sensitive to local pedagogical and cultural contexts.

15:00 - 15:50
PARALLEL SESSION 11

TOPIC: AFRICOIL: Towards an Integrated African COIL Network for Decolonial, Inclusive Internationalisation
SPEAKERS:
• Lavern Samuels, Durban University of Technology
• Jon Ruben, Coil Connect
• Divinia Jithoo, Cape Peninsula University of Technology

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 3

Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) has emerged globally as a powerful pedagogy for internationalisation at home, curriculum innovation and the development of students’ intercultural competence without reliance on physical mobility. Yet, in South Africa and across the continent, COIL practice and international virtual engagement remain uneven, fragmented and often oriented towards partners in the global North, despite clear policy and scholarly calls to prioritise intra‑Africa and South–South collaboration. Bibliometric and conceptual work on internationalisation and decolonisation highlights a persistent imbalance in collaboration patterns and the continued dominance of Eurocentric frameworks, underscoring the need for Africa‑centred, decolonial approaches that place African epistemologies, indigenous knowledge systems and regional priorities at the centre of curricula and partnerships.
This parallel session will introduce AFRICOIL (African Regional Collaborative Online International Learning Hub), a newly established, African‑led network designed to function as a regional COIL hub “with and within Africa”.

AFRICOIL’s long‑term vision is to make Africa‑centred, decolonial COIL a core feature of teaching, learning and knowledge production on the continent by building staff and institutional capacity, brokering and supporting intra‑Africa COIL partnerships, and aligning institutional policies and practices with national and continental priorities such as the DHET Policy Framework for Internationalisation of Higher Education in South Africa, Agenda 2063 and the Continental Education Strategy for Africa. Drawing on lessons from initiatives such as iKudu, LatAm COIL and other regional networks, AFRICOIL adopts a hub‑and‑spokes model that integrates four interrelated focus areas: professional development and pedagogy; partnering and network development; policy, strategy and systems; and knowledge, funding and sustainability.

15:00 - 15:50
PARALLEL SESSION 12

TOPIC: The Living Lab: A Case Study in Student-Led, South Innovation
SPEAKERS:
• Excellent Nxumalo, University of Zululand

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 4

The Premise: Flipping the Script
Traditional internationalization views Global South students through a deficit lens—as recipients of Northern expertise or mere statistics. This session uses a powerful case study to flip that script, showing what happens when students are trusted as leaders, not learners.

The Case: The Greening with STI Bootcamp
In 2024, UNESCO IESALC and the UN Office for South-South Cooperation launched a radical experiment: bring 250 students from 10 universities across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East together for 16 weeks. Their mission? Not to study sustainability, but to solve it. The result was a living laboratory of South-South innovation.

The Evidence: Innovation Rooted in Lived Experience
Students didn’t draft essays; they built prototypes. Three examples prove the power of this model:

– Brazil (University of São Paulo): Students from flood-prone communities developed a low-cost, autonomous flood alert device for vulnerable favelas—technology born from lived experience, not textbooks.
– UAE (Zayed University): An all-female team created “Seashell Shoes,” safety footwear from industrial shell waste, turning a local environmental problem into a circular economy solution.
– Brazil (Agro na Escola): A digital platform now connects family farmers directly with public schools, addressing food security, local economies, and student nutrition in one integrated solution.

The Analysis: Why This Works
This case study reveals three principles that rewrite the internationalisation agenda:

1. Horizontal Knowledge Flow: It replaces “brain drain” with “brain gain,” creating networks where knowledge circulates South-to-South.
2. Legitimising Lived Experience: It treats students’ local realities as valid data, producing solutions that are contextually relevant and immediately applicable.
3. Youth Leadership Now: By operating at the UN level, it proves students are not just future leaders—they are leaders today.

The Session: An Interactive Strategy Lab

This is not a lecture. Attendees will:
– Hear directly from student innovators via video testimonials.
– Analyse what made the bootcamp succeed where traditional models fail.
– Take part in a “Strategy Lab “to design a blueprint for replicating this model in their own institutions or networks.

The Takeaway
Participants will leave with a concrete roadmap for transforming students from passive beneficiaries into active co-creators of international knowledge. This session proves that when we trust the Global South’s youth, they don’t just take part

15:00 - 15:50
PARALLEL SESSION 13

SPONSOR SPOTLIGHT

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 5

15:00 - 15:50
PARALLEL SESSION 14

TOPIC: Beyond Borders: Critical Pedagogy and Social Justice for International Student Integration in Higher Education
SPEAKERS:
• Mary Abura, Hansung University

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 6

The aim of my larger research is to make international student presence and experiences more equitable by providing a bridge to the learning community that fosters integration with regard to diversity and inclusion. Drawing on insights from critical pedagogy and social justice, this work reimagines teaching strategies to actively embrace the diverse linguistic, cultural, and academic backgrounds characteristic of today’s internationalized classrooms.

The first half of the paper presents a critical review of pedagogical theories and explores ‘pedagogies of emplacement’ as a powerful framework. This approach advocates for integrating local contexts and material realities into learning, thereby actively resisting coloniality/modernity in education and fostering deeper, more authentic engagement for international students. The modern university has a particular shape that is recognizable across the globe. Knowledge making is organized into distinct and discrete units (the disciplines), which compete for resources, prestige, and students (Gordan, 2014); while the spaces of knowledge-making are removed from the everyday world of wider society (Nyamjoh, 2019). Displacement in contemporary pedagogy occurs throughout the university. The authors argue that one way to resist coloniality/modernity is to bring place and materiality more strongly into pedagogy through emplacement.

The second section of this literature will position the importance of inclusive and diverse education in this research. The issues of social justice and critical pedagogy are important themes in this literature as they relate to student equitable pedagogical experiences, the focus of the research. The questions tackled are twofold: (1) What pedagogies center the student in the classroom? (2) In which ways do the identified pedagogies provide cultural sensitivity to the guest learner? This paper employs a narrative literature review to comprehensively synthesize diverse pedagogical approaches, identifying those that most effectively center the student and promote cultural sensitivity within internationalized learning environments. This paper offers critical insights for educators, curriculum developers, and internationalization practitioners seeking to implement more equitable and culturally responsive pedagogies. It provides actionable frameworks to address social justice issues faced by international students, ultimately enriching their academic experiences and fostering truly inclusive host institutions.

Amid the growing imperative for equitable internationalization in higher education, this paper critically examines how pedagogical innovation can transform the learning experiences of international students. We argue that despite increased international student mobility, traditional pedagogies often fail to adequately foster true integration and address issues of diversity and inclusion.

15:00 - 15:50
PARALLEL SESSION 15

Phola & Connect “Refreshment Break”

15:50 - 16:20

Plenary Panel, Powered by Rhodes University
TOPIC:
Trust, Legitimacy, and Leadership: Universities in a Complex and Contested Space
SPEAKERS: TBC
CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 1

16:20 - 17:30
PLENARY PANEL DISCUSSION

Wamkelekile: “An Eastern Cape Welcome”
VENUE: ZAZA BEACH CLUB

19:00 - 22:30

REGISTRATION DESK OPEN

07:30 - 16:00

Take a breath, Link up

06:00

08:30 – 08:45  Welcome & Ice Breakers
08:45 – 09:00  “Study South Africa Guide 2026 – 23rd Edition Official Launch”

09:00 – 10:00  Plenary Panel, Powered by University of Fort Hare
TOPIC: From Policy to Practice: Institutionalising Internationalisation in South African Universities
SPEAKER: TBC
CHAIRPERSON: Lebethe Malefo, University of Fort Hare
VENUE: Conference Room 1

08:30 - 10:00
OPENING PLENARY

Launch of the Immigration Manual 2026

10:00 - 10:15

Phola & Connect "Refreshment Break"

10:15 - 10:45

Plenary Panel, Powered by QS
TOPIC:
Rewriting global academic networks: How Global South institutions are reshaping reputation and collaboration
SPEAKERS:
Dr Ashwin Fernandes, Vice President, Strategic and International Engagement, QS
CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 1

10:45 - 11:45
PLENARY PANEL DISCUSSION

Phola & Connect “Refreshment Break”

11:45 - 12:15

TOPIC: Moving Beyond the South–North Dichotomy in International Higher Education Partnerships 
SPEAKERS:
• Samia Chasi,. University of the Witwatersrand

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 2

Using examples from the South African higher education sector and drawing on decolonial approaches to higher education and internationalisation, the session calls for a rethinking of dominant paradigms that shape international partnerships. It explores the potential of a “third space” as a conceptual framework that moves beyond binaries in South–North relationships. It also proposes a set of guiding questions that practitioners can use to critically reflect on their own partnerships practice. These questions aim to stimulate discussion on how higher education actors can move towards reimagined international partnerships in higher education globally.

The session is based on a recently published book chapter titled “Challenging the South-North Dichotomy in International Partnerships: Beyond Global South and North” (Chasi & Heleta, 2025, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003536406-6).

12:15 - 13:15
PARALLEL SESSION 1

TOPIC: Interpreting Partnership Value in South Africa–Japan Higher Education Collaboration: Insights from the SAJU Forum
SPEAKERS:
• Inge Odendaal, Kansai Gaidai University

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 3

Knight (2021) observes that international higher education is often viewed through the lens of exchange, partnership, and mutual benefit. Yet such collaborations do not develop in neutral conditions. They are formed by different national priorities, institutional pressures, and strategic interests (Crossley, 2022). This is especially relevant in the South Africa–Japan context, where differing policy histories and goals shape each system’s approach to collaboration (Maki & Wolhuter, 2024). Consequently, each side may define valuable collaboration differently.

This presentation examines how South African and Japanese policy and forum discourse frame partnership value and success in bilateral academic collaboration, using the South Africa–Japan University Forum (SAJU) as a case study. SAJU is a recurring platform where universities from both countries organise, articulate, and justify their collaborative efforts (South Africa–Japan University Forum, 2019, 2022, 2024). The presentation focuses on this specific site within the larger South Africa–Japan relationship.

12:15 - 13:15
PARALLEL SESSION 2

TOPIC: Empowering Southern Voices: Student Agency and Practitioner Professionalisation in Global South Internationalisation
SPEAKERS:
• Mlondolozi Mvikweni, Walter Sisulu University

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 4

Purpose
This paper addresses power imbalances in global higher education by foregrounding Southern innovations in equity and collaboration. It aims to elevate student voices as co-creators and redefine practitioner roles through decolonial frameworks, drawing on South African contexts to propose scalable models for Africa-led internationalisation.

Content
The contribution is structured around two sub-themes. First, student voices, agency, and leadership analyzes cases from Walter Sisulu University, where students drive South-South mobility initiatives and digital platforms for cultural exchange. These youth-led models challenge Northern-centric narratives, emphasizing participatory research partnerships that integrate sustainability and local relevance.

Second, professional futures of internationalisation practitioners explores professionalisation strategies, including skills development via communities of practice and career pathways informed by NGO-academia collaborations (e.g., Oxfam and ActionAid South Africa). It critiques resource constraints in Southern institutions and advocates hybrid training blending doctrinal research with digital ethnography for resilient leadership.

Methods include desktop analysis of policy documents, student surveys, and practitioner interviews, ensuring gender-disaggregated data and pluriversal perspectives from Africa, Latin America, and Asia.

Expected Outcomes
Participants will gain actionable frameworks for institutionalizing student-practitioner synergies, fostering equitable research collaborations. The paper anticipates policy recommendations for IEASA members, such as youth innovation hubs and professional certification pathways. Ultimately, it seeks to influence conference dialogues, promoting Global South agendas that redefine global mobility, curricula, and digital engagement for sustainability and inclusion.

12:15 - 13:15
PARALLEL SESSION 3

TOPIC: Rewriting the Agenda: Internationalisation Through a Global South Lens
SPEAKERS:
• Divinia Jithoo, Cape Peninsula University of Technology
• Dr Valile Dway, Central University of Technology
• Ms Orla Quinlan, Rhodes University
• Dr Tasmeera Singh, University of the Western Cape

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 5

South Africa’s Department of Home Affairs announced the identification of over 2,000 fraudulently issued study visas, linked to internal syndicates operating within the immigration system. The public framing of this revelation articulated by Minister Leon Schreiber under the authority of Cyril Ramaphosa’s Proclamation 154 of 2024 rightly underscores the imperative to restore administrative integrity. Yet it also invites a deeper interrogation: does the prevailing narrative risk reinscribing the figure of the “foreign national” as suspect, as other, and by extension, as criminal, rather than centering systemic governance failures?

This proposed panel engages critically with the tension between immigration enforcement discourse and the ethical imperatives of inclusive internationalisation. While the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) has revealed entrenched corruption describing an immigration regime treated as a “marketplace” public communication has largely emphasized visa cancellations, deportations, and prosecution. Such emphasis, absent nuanced differentiation between perpetrators and bona fide students, risks amplifying securitized framings of mobility. In doing so, it may inadvertently erode trust in South–South academic exchange and reinforce epistemic hierarchies that already marginalize Global South scholars.

Situated within the sub-theme of Inclusive and Innovative Mobility Ecosystems, this panel asks: How can higher education institutions, policymakers, and mobility practitioners recalibrate the discourse so that governance reform does not translate into xenophobic moral panic? What would it mean to design a mobility ecosystem that integrates the current visa systems, assisted verification? How can universities act as intermediaries of narrative justice advocating for systemic accountability without reproducing the criminalization of international students?

Bringing together voices from Higher Education Internationalisation leaders from all three institutional time, Trational Universities, Universities of Technology and Research-Intensive Universities, the dialogue will foreground three interventions. First, a structural reading of visa fraud as an institutional failure rather than migrant deviance. Second, the articulation of a South–South mobility compact that leverages virtual exchange and compliance mechanisms to mitigate risk. Third, the reframing of international students not as regulatory liabilities, but as co-producers of knowledge within a decolonial project of global engagement.

In rewriting the agenda through a Global South lens, this panel contends that integrity and inclusion are not mutually exclusive. Rather, sustainable internationalisation demands both systemic reform and a discursive shift away from the criminalization of mobility and toward the co-construction of equitable, innovative, and trust-based ecosystems.

12:15 - 13:15
PARALLEL SESSION 4

TOPIC: Northern Lenses, Global Questions: The Multidimensional Roles of Senior International Officers and Implications for Professionalization Across Contexts
SPEAKERS:
• Iyonka Strawn-Valcy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 6

This session offers findings from my qualitative dissertation study on how Senior International Officers (SIOs) at U.S. research universities lead across boundaries, taking on adaptive, relational, and entrepreneurial demands in their everyday work. As this will be my third IEASA iteration, this research has further developed beyond its dissertation origins into a broader inquiry into SIO leadership, professional identity, and the forces that shape internationalization strategy. I am proposing to offer this session in the spirit of comparative dialogue, though not as a universal model, and as an invitation for Global South practitioners to question, build on, or reject entirely what Northern institutional lenses reveal, but also what they may leave out.
In terms of positionality – the theoretical frameworks in this study, including contingency theory, intellectual leadership theory, and Steger’s multidimensional globalization framework, stem from Western scholarly traditions. De Sousa Santos (2014) reminds us that deciding who counts as an international education professional, which competencies get recognized, and which career paths are seen as legitimate are not neutral choices. They carry embedded assumptions about where authority originates and whose knowledge counts.
Drawing on in-depth interviews with 15 SIOs, my dissertation identified six interconnected leadership roles: Entrepreneurial Program Developer, Institutional Diplomat, Bridge-Builder, Problem Solver, Crisis Manager, and Internationalization Advocate. Together, these roles indicate the complexity, invisibility components of the SIO role, also contributing to how high-stakes SIO leadership can be – specifically in decentralized institutions that may be under constant pressure.
For IEASA 2026, what matters most are the questions these roles provoke. I will invite participants to use the six roles as a diagnostic lens for their own work. Which roles does your institution formally recognize and fund? Which ones do you carry out invisibly, without title, credit, or career advancement? And which roles feel entirely foreign to your context? These caps and variances are worth exploring in both Global North and Global South contexts. When the Entrepreneurial Program Developer assumes discretionary resources that do not exist, or when the Institutional Diplomat navigates power asymmetries rooted in colonial-era partnership structures, the professional terrain calls for its own theorization (Sehoole & Knight, 2013).
In terms of the conference’s sub-theme – professionalization in international education, as well as related competency frameworks, career pathways, and communities of practice, can be richer and more equitable when drawing from multiple starting points. This session is one contribution to that work, and an opening for co-construction with organizations like IEASA.

12:15 - 13:15
PARALLEL SESSION 5

Hlanganani Networking Lunch “Gather Together”

13:15 - 14:15

TOPIC: Internationalising Sustainability: Global South Collaboration for Just Energy and Water Transitions
SPEAKERS:
• Ivan Steenkamp , Aqua Energy Research Institute

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 2

This session explores how higher education institutions can reshape internationalisation agendas by foregrounding Global South perspectives in sustainability research, education, and collaboration. Drawing on the proposed work of AquaEnergy and related interdisciplinary initiatives, the session will highlight how universities can contribute to addressing interconnected challenges of energy transitions, water security, and climate resilience through inclusive and equitable international partnerships.
The purpose of this contribution is to demonstrate how Global South institutions can play a leading role in advancing sustainability-focused internationalisation strategies that move beyond traditional North–South knowledge flows. Instead, the session emphasises collaborative models that support knowledge co-creation, locally relevant innovation, and socially just transitions in energy and water systems.
The presentation will provide an overview of the water–energy–climate nexus and discuss why integrated approaches are essential for responding to complex sustainability challenges, particularly in the Global South. It will also introduce examples of collaborative research and capacity-building initiatives that bring together universities, communities, policymakers, and international partners to co-develop solutions that address local priorities while contributing to global sustainability goals.
The session will further examine how international partnerships can support interdisciplinary research, student engagement, and knowledge exchange that strengthen institutional capacity in areas such as climate adaptation, sustainable energy systems, and water resource management. Particular attention will be given to the role of universities as knowledge hubs and catalysts for innovation, enabling the translation of research into practical policy and community-based outcomes.
Expected outcomes of the session include increased awareness among participants of the importance of integrating Global South perspectives into internationalisation strategies, as well as practical insights into how collaborative partnerships can support sustainability-focused research and education. Participants will gain a clearer understanding of how higher education institutions can contribute to just energy and water transitions while strengthening international collaboration networks.
Ultimately, the session aims to inspire institutions to rethink internationalisation not only as mobility or partnership building, but also as a platform for advancing inclusive, context-driven solutions to global sustainability challenges, led by the knowledge, expertise, and priorities of the Global South.

14:15 - 15:05
PARALLEL SESSION 6

TOPIC: Internationalization through a Global Lens: Using African Indigeneity in Education to Support Global Classrooms for African and US Education Collaborations
SPEAKERS:
• Candace M. Moore, University of Maryland
• Michael Boakye-Yiadom, University of Cape Coast

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 3

As education professionals, we should understand the implications of African indigenous knowledge on education systems in an international context. Colleagues from University of Cape Coast, Ghana and the University of Maryland, United States have partnered to co-teach a global classroom with the financial support of the Office of International Affairs at the University of Maryland. The course focuses on the impacts of African indigenous knowledge systems across the education pipeline. Particularly considering the sociohistorical relationship between the United States and West Africa, the program expands beyond Western ideals education and engages participants in a critical examination of concepts related to power, privilege, and oppression through the lens of indigeneity in learning spaces. Moreover, West Africa is a great location for knowledge exchange; there is a great deal of formal and cultural knowledge awaiting the attention of U.S. education scholars and practitioners. The course includes current graduate students in student affairs, higher education, international education, public policy programs as well as student affairs, higher education/international education professionals. Overall, students will: (a) gain new insight into the rich culture and traditions of the country and people of Ghana, (b) explore the role of education in a global scale and its connections to the primary, secondary, and tertiary educational pipeline in both the pre-colonial and post liberation Ghanaian contexts, (c) explore African forms of knowledge creation, acquisition, and dissemination, and (d) engage in the local knowledge systems and uncover their connections to the broader practical applications of theory, and (e) reflect on the experiences gained through the course, and (e) collaborate with a Ghanaian education partners on a project-based experiential learning opportunity.
The course focuses on project based learning for students in collaboration with education professionals in Ghana and the United States. Moreover, since the course has a project based experiential learning design, students are able to strengthen their assessment, evaluation, and program improvement skills and acknowledge; yet, center the educational and cultural influences of African indigeneity in global education. Additionally, the program provides an opportunity for students and professionals to expand their framework of practice in an international context, supporting their development as global social justice educators.
This session will explore the opportunities for building sustainable partnerships to create global classrooms that decenter whiteness, focus on elevating local knowledge in education administration, promote collaborative education/learning pedagogies, and explore innovative learning assessments that advocate for education improvement practices/pedagogies, and a more informed value of global citizenry through social justice education. The session serves to benefit faculty, academic administrators, and graduate students–offering lessons learned in developing and implementing sustainable programs and partnerships in international education.

14:15 - 15:05
PARALLEL SESSION 7

TOPIC: A Critical Evaluation of the Nelson Mandela Bay Declaration of January 2014 – it relevance in today’s disrupted world. 
SPEAKERS:
• Nico Jooste, IMM Graduate School & African Centre for Higher Education

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 4

The Nelson Mandela Bay Declaration on the future of internationalisation of Higher Education represented at least 80% of the global student population. The declaration expressed a commitment to concentrate future agendas on three areas. First, enhancing quality and diversity in programmes that involve student, academic, and administrative staff mobility. Second, increasing focus on the internationalisation of the curriculum and related learning outcomes. Third, seeking global commitment to equal and ethical higher education partnerships. The declaration also identified ten action steps for implementation.
This presentation will critically evaluate how organisations have implemented the Declaration. It will focus on organisations committed to it and the NIEA (Network of International Education Associations). The presentation will also assess the value and relevance of the Declaration in today’s complex and disrupted world. In addition, it will examine the Declaration’s relevance to the emerging New World Order.

14:15 - 15:05
PARALLEL SESSION 8

TOPIC: Transformative Partnerships in Practice: Lessons from South Africa–Sweden Research Collaborations
SPEAKERS:
• Helin Bäckman Kartal, Uppsala University
• Valencia Mashiloane, National Research Foundation

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 5

Calls for more equitable and transformative international research partnerships have become increasingly prominent in global higher education discourse. Frameworks such as the Africa Charter for Transformative Research Collaborations highlight the importance of mutual benefit, shared leadership, equitable participation, and long-term institutional strengthening. However, while these principles are widely endorsed, there remains a need to better understand how such ambitions unfold in practice within funded international collaborations.

This session presents insights from an ongoing evaluation of collaborative research projects funded through the South Africa–Sweden University Forum (SASUF), a platform connecting universities across both countries. Since its establishment, numerous joint research initiatives have been supported with the aim of strengthening partnerships, enabling joint knowledge production, and fostering inclusive academic collaboration.

Drawing on survey responses and reflections from researchers involved in funded projects, the study explores how collaborative ambitions outlined in project proposals translate into practice once projects are underway. Particular attention is given to the participation of different institutional partners, including historically disadvantaged institutions (HDIs) in South Africa, and how eligibility criteria and partnership requirements are experienced by participating researchers.

14:15 - 15:05
PARALLEL SESSION 9

TOPIC: Rewriting Internationalisation: Designing Ethical and Inclusive Mobility Programs
SPEAKERS:
• Natasha Tereshchenko, The Knox School

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 6

International mobility has long been one of the most visible expressions of education internationalisation. Educational institutions frequently measure success through the number of exchange students, international partnerships, and short-term study programs delivered across borders. Yet many practitioners increasingly recognise that mobility initiatives can also reproduce unequal relationships between institutions, position host communities primarily as sites of learning rather than partners in knowledge exchange, and leave students insufficiently prepared for the cultural and ethical complexities of global engagement.

This interactive session invites participants to step back and reconsider how international mobility programs are conceptualised and designed. Rather than approaching mobility primarily as a logistical or recruitment exercise, the session explores how universities might understand mobility as a process of mutual learning, grounded in reciprocity, cultural humility, and meaningful partnership. Such an approach is particularly relevant as institutions across Africa and the broader Global South continue to shape more contextually grounded models of internationalisation.

Drawing on perspectives from anthropology, intercultural learning, and practical experience in international education, the session will briefly introduce several recurring challenges in mobility program design. These include asymmetries in institutional partnerships, limited recognition of local knowledge systems, and the difficulties students face when navigating unfamiliar cultural and social environments. These questions become especially important when mobility initiatives seek to foster deeper collaboration across the Global South.

Following this short framing, participants will work in small groups to examine a set of practical scenarios drawn from study tours, exchange programs, and short-term mobility initiatives. Through guided discussion, participants will identify potential ethical tensions and explore how program elements – from partnership design to student preparation and community engagement – might be structured to support more reciprocal and inclusive forms of exchange.

The aim of the session is not to create space for collective reflection among practitioners who shape international mobility programs. Participants will leave with a set of practical principles that can inform program design, deeper awareness of the ethical dimensions of mobility, and opportunities to exchange experiences with colleagues working across diverse institutional and regional contexts. In doing so, the session contributes to broader conversations about how internationalisation can evolve in ways that are more equitable, context-sensitive, and responsive to perspectives emerging from the Global South.

14:15 - 15:05
PARALLEL SESSION 10

TOPIC: Architects, Not Administrators: Building Global South Futures in Internationalisation
SPEAKERS:
• Dingaan Booi, Cape Peninsula University of Technology

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 2

Internationalisation in higher education stands at an inflection point. For decades, practitioners in the Global South have operated within inherited architectures—policy frameworks, mobility paradigms, ranking regimes, and partnership models largely conceptualised elsewhere. While these frameworks have facilitated global connectivity, they have simultaneously positioned many Global South professionals as implementers of externally designed agendas rather than authors of their own. The 28th IEASA Annual Conference theme, “Rewriting the Agenda: Internationalisation Through a Global South Lens,” invites a decisive departure from this condition. This presentation responds by interrogating what it means for internationalisation practitioners to move from administrative custodianship to strategic authorship.

The central argument advanced in this session is that the professional future of internationalisation in the Global South depends on a deliberate reconceptualisation of practitioner identity. No longer confined to coordinating mobility flows or ensuring regulatory compliance, practitioners increasingly occupy the nexus of knowledge diplomacy, digital engagement ecosystems, South-driven research brokerage, language inclusion, and institutional transformation. Yet institutional role definitions, career pathways, and professional development frameworks have not evolved at the same pace as these expanding mandates. This disjuncture risks underutilising strategic capacity precisely at a moment when Global South leadership is most required.

Drawing on emerging practice across African higher education contexts, the presentation situates professionalisation not merely as skills acquisition, but as epistemic repositioning. To professionalise internationalisation within a Global South lens is to legitimise contextually grounded expertise, to cultivate leadership literacies attuned to asymmetrical global power dynamics, and to foster communities of practice that generate and circulate knowledge from the South outward. It entails recognising practitioners as institutional strategists—architects shaping partnership portfolios, digital infrastructures, research agendas, and equity-driven mobility models.

Through a structured interactive dialogue, participants will collectively examine the competencies, leadership capabilities, and institutional reforms necessary to sustain this shift. The session ultimately proposes that rewriting the agenda of internationalisation requires parallel attention to rewriting the professional scripts of those tasked with advancing it. In doing so, it affirms that Global South practitioners are not peripheral actors in internationalisation, but central designers of its next chapter.

15:15 - 16:05
PARALLEL SESSION 11

TOPIC: Principled Internationalisation from the Global South: Rewriting Equity, Reciprocity, and Responsibility in Higher Education
SPEAKERS:
• Tracy G. Firfirey, University of the Western Cape
• Divinia Jithoo, Cape Peninsula University of to Technology

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 3

Internationalisation has long been framed through Global North paradigms that privilege mobility, rankings, and market-driven partnerships, often marginalising Global South priorities and realities. In response to growing calls to “rewrite the agenda,” this paper advances principled internationalisation as a framework grounded in equity, reciprocity, contextual relevance, and social responsibility, viewed explicitly through a Global South lens.

Drawing on policy analysis, institutional practice, and illustrative case examples from Global South contexts, the paper interrogates how internationalisation can move beyond extractive collaborations and symbolic inclusion toward transformative and mutually beneficial engagement. Principled internationalisation is presented not as a rejection of global collaboration, but as a recalibration—one that centres local knowledge systems, addresses historical and structural inequities, and aligns international activity with national and regional development priorities.

The presentation explores three interrelated dimensions:
(1) Equity, examining access, power asymmetries, and ethical partnership design;
(2) Reciprocity, focusing on co-creation, shared governance, and balanced knowledge exchange; and
(3) Responsibility, highlighting accountability to communities, sustainability, and the public good.

By foregrounding Global South experiences and leadership, the paper contributes to ongoing debates about decolonising internationalisation and offers a practical lens for institutions, policymakers, and practitioners seeking to operationalise values-driven approaches. The session concludes with reflective questions and actionable considerations for embedding principled internationalisation within institutional strategies, partnerships, and mobility framework

15:15 - 16:05
PARALLEL SESSION 12

TOPIC: Black Beyond the Bayou: Reimagining Diasporic Connections Between the U.S. American South and Africa Through a Global South Lens
SPEAKERS:
• Stephanie Tilley, University of Johannesburg

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 4

Dominant global narratives about the United States of America (USA) are often shaped by its current, nationalistic and divisive political leadership that obscures the complexity, diversity, and global connectedness of its communities. Under Trump’s leadership, global solidarity and communities have been severely damaged and threatened and historically marginalized narratives within the USA are increasingly undermined, devalued, and defunded. Therefore, it is especially urgent to center alternative perspectives rooted in truth, relationality, and shared histories across the Global South.

“Black Beyond the Bayou: Reimagining Diasporic Connections Between the U.S. American South and Africa Through a Global South Lens” is reflective of a new and emerging research project constructed by the presenter. This research project explores the historical and contemporary diasporic relationships between the U.S. American South and the African continent shaped by the Transatlantic Slave Trade and how these connections can be used to strengthen contemporary Pan-African solidarities, diaspora-led global learning and study abroad partnerships between these regions.

Guided by the African knowledge systems of Ubuntu and Sankofa, this research employs a relational and historically grounded approach to understanding diasporic experiences. Ubuntu emphasizes collective humanity and interconnectedness among people, places, and histories. Sankofa underscores the importance of engaging in the past to understand and to inform present and future possibilities. Focusing initially on Louisiana within the U.S. South and its historical, cultural and social links with West Africa, this project explores how these connections are remembered, preserved, and reimagined through archives, historical texts, cultural sites, and lived narratives. Preliminary research includes site visits to Africatown in Mobile, Alabama (historically connected to Louisiana’s colonial past) and as well as early engagement with historical literature documenting connections between the U.S. South and Africa.

This presentation introduces the early conceptual framing of the project, shares preliminary observations from initial site visits, current and relevant literature, and reflects on the presenter’s positionality as a Louisiana native and scholar whose work is rooted in international higher education, global black studies and fostering African diaspora-led global learning. The session will conclude with an interactive discussion exploring how African diasporic perspectives can inform more equitable internationalization practices, strengthen study abroad programs and institutional partnerships between the U.S. American South and African institutions. By centering Global South perspectives and diasporic knowledge systems, this project seeks to contribute to ongoing efforts to “rewrite the agenda” of internationalization through narratives of connection, solidarity, and historically grounded global engagement. This work challenges dominant, Western and colonized narratives of internationalization by centering African diasporic histories, knowledge systems, and partnerships rooted in the Global South.

15:15 - 16:05
PARALLEL SESSION 13

TOPIC: SANORD in Practice: UWC’s Experience in Networked Internationalisation
SPEAKERS:
Lauren Human, University of the Western Cape
• Nicole Umwizerwa, SANORD Officer
• Jordan King, University of the Western Cape
Rushni Salie, University of the Western Cape
CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 5

Internationalisation in higher education has traditionally been framed as a North South exchange, often privileging institutions in the Global North and producing asymmetrical relationships. Membership based academic networks, however, offer opportunities for alternative pathways to collaborate that prioritise equity and inclusion, reciprocity, and sustainability. This paper explores how the Southern African Nordic Centre (SANORD) network based at the University of the Western Cape through its member engagements can reshape the internationalisation agenda of the Global South. Drawing on institutional practices, collaborative initiatives, and experiences of staff and student mobility within SANORD, this study illustrates how these networks enable co-created research, shared leadership, and more inclusive participation shaping global knowledge production. This study highlights how UWC leverages the SANORD membership to move beyond transactional international partnerships, fostering long-term capacity development, mutual benefit and enabling transformational approaches. By understanding internationalisation as a lived experience within a networked context, this paper contributes to ongoing debates on Global South agency, equitable partnerships, and sustainable international collaboration. The findings suggest that academic networks like SANORD offer a model for reimagining internationalisation that challenges hierarchical, North–South paradigms and embeds collaborative practices into the institutional fabric of participating universities.

15:15 - 16:05
PARALLEL SESSION 14

TOPIC: Critical Geopolitics of International Education: An Investigation of the Role of Public Diplomacy in International Education Exchange Programmes among African participants in China and Japan.
SPEAKERS:
• Thami Mahlobo, Stellenbosch University

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 6

Insights to be shared at IEASA 2026 emanate from the preliminary research findings and reflections of my ongoing PhD research in the Department of Political Science at Stellenbosch University. The title of my dissertation is “ Critical Geopolitics of International Education: An Investigation of the Role of Public Diplomacy in International Education Exchange Programmes among African participants in China and Japan. In keeping with the theme of IEASA 28, by illuminating the voices of African participants in scholarships/ IEEPS (International Education Exchange Programs) such as MEXT, JET, ABE Initiative, China Government Scholarship, we are in fact decolonizing. And indeed, highlighting the shift from one-way knowledge transfer to mutual co-creation. At the time of the submission of this IEASA proposal, I can confirm 19 interviews had been done, and preliminary research findings communicated with my supervisor.

In the East Asian context, China and Japan have fostered longstanding educational cooperation with the African continent. Nordtveit (2010) locates more recent facets of Chinese educational aid to Africa within the action plan from the Third and Fourth Forum on China-African Cooperation (FOCAC). The number of African students in China and Japan are increasing year by year (Gonondo, 2017). Scholars have noted the need to investigate the individual and social outcomes of IEEPs. Hong, Jeon and Ayhan (2021) contend that there are normative and methodological questions about the values that underpin programmes, and that the behaviours and attitudes of participants and alumni, as well as post-scholarship programme transition should also be explored. Other scholars (e.g., McDowell, 2008, Geibel, 2018, Eytan, 2001) hold that IEEPs and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) facilitate the mobility of international scholars and students and that these serve as vehicles for public diplomacy.

In the context of African participants in Chinese and Japanese IEEPs, however, little is known. Through very explicit objectives of IEEPs such as the ABE Initiative, the JET Programme, the MEXT Scholarship, the Confucius Institute, and the Chinese Government Scholarship, countries aim to influence international students’ beliefs and attitudes toward the host country. Ayhan, Gouda and Lee (2023) embolden the aforementioned statement in their postulation that the most basic premise of inbound student mobility programs is to familiarize international students with the host country’s culture, values, lifestyle, political system, economy, and people.

This study draws on the experiences of 19 African alumni who participated in IEEPs in Japan and China. These participants were drawn from diverse professional and national backgrounds across Africa. Specifically, the study features recipients and alumni of the MEXT, JET, ABE Initiative, and Chinese Government Scholarship programs.

15:15 - 16:05
PARALLEL SESSION 15

Phola & Connect “Refreshment Break”

16:05 - 16:30

TOPIC: Africa-Led Global Engagement and Knowledge Diplomacy: Repositioning the University of Pretoria as Agenda-Setter in Internationalisation
SPEAKERS:
• Fundie Nsibande, University of Pretoria

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 2

Internationalisation in higher education has historically been shaped by asymmetrical knowledge flows, funding structures, and partnership models that privilege Global North institutions. This poster examines how Africa-led global engagement can reposition universities on the continent as agenda-setters rather than participants within international higher education systems. Framed through the concept of knowledge diplomacy, the study explores how African institutions can strategically leverage research leadership, equitable partnerships, curriculum innovation, and regional cooperation to influence global academic agendas.
Using the University of Pretoria (UP) as a case study, the poster analyses institutional strategies that foreground African research priorities, expand South–South collaboration, and embed contextual epistemologies within international programmes. The analysis highlights shifts from transactional mobility agreements toward co-created research platforms, joint postgraduate supervision models, and partnerships anchored in shared societal challenges such as climate resilience, public health, and urban transformation.
The poster proposes a four-pillar framework for Africa-led internationalisation: research agenda-setting, equitable partnership governance, epistemic inclusion in curricula, and policy influence through regional networks. By mapping emerging practices against traditional internationalisation models, the study demonstrates how African universities can exercise intellectual authority while strengthening global engagement.
The findings contribute to ongoing debates on decolonising internationalisation and offer practical indicators for measuring partnership reciprocity and knowledge equity. Ultimately, the poster argues that transformative internationalisation requires a redistribution of agenda-setting power within global higher education systems

16:30 - 17:15
POSTER SESSION 1

TOPIC: Unpacking African and Global South Knowledge Diplomacy as a Strategy for Shaping South-Driven Research Agendas
SPEAKERS:
• Tshepang Modipnae, University of Limpopo

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 3

The global higher education landscape is undergoing a significant transformation as institutions in the Global South increasingly seek to assert intellectual agency within historically asymmetrical systems of knowledge production. Traditional models of internationalisation have often positioned universities in Africa as peripheral participants in global research networks, where research agendas, funding priorities, and knowledge dissemination structures are largely shaped by institutions in the Global North (Altbach and de Wit, 2017). In response, emerging debates on knowledge diplomacy emphasise the strategic use of international academic collaboration as a mechanism for advancing national and regional development priorities while strengthening intellectual sovereignty (Knight, 2018).
This paper examines the role of Africa-led knowledge diplomacy as a strategy for reshaping global research engagement through the lens of the University of Limpopo (UL) in South Africa. Situated within a historically disadvantaged institutional context and serving a predominantly rural region, UL provides an important case study for exploring how African universities can utilise international partnerships to advance South-driven research agendas while maintaining meaningful global collaboration. The study is situated within the policy context of South Africa’s Policy Framework for the Internationalisation of Higher Education (Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET), 2017), which emphasises the importance of equitable partnerships and knowledge exchange in international engagement. At the institutional level, UL’s Internationalisation Policy and its Strategic Plan 2026–2030 further articulate the university’s commitment to strengthening international partnerships, expanding research collaboration, and enhancing global visibility while remaining responsive to African developmental priorities (University of Limpopo, 2024; University of Limpopo, 2025).
Drawing on decolonial and Global South theoretical perspectives (Mignolo, 2011; Ndlovu-Gatsheni, 2013), the paper employs a qualitative case study approach incorporating institutional policy analysis, partnership mapping, and strategic document review to examine how UL’s internationalisation agenda aligns with emerging models of knowledge diplomacy. The study proposes a conceptual framework for Africa-led knowledge diplomacy, highlighting three strategic dimensions: epistemic sovereignty, which prioritises African research agendas and knowledge systems; equitable partnership governance, which seeks to rebalance decision-making authority within international collaborations; and South-driven research networks, which strengthen collaboration among African and broader Global South institutions.
The paper argues that African universities have the potential to play a more proactive role in shaping global knowledge systems through strategic international engagement grounded in regional priorities and developmental impact. By positioning the University of Limpopo as an emerging institutional example of Africa-led knowledge diplomacy, the study contributes to broader debates on decolonising internationalisation and rebalancing power in global higher education, highlighting how universities in the Global South can move beyond participation in international research networks toward actively shaping them.

16:30 - 17:15
POSTER SESSION 2

TOPIC: Confronting time in North-South academic partnerships: towards decentering Global North temporalities
SPEAKERS:
• Anaïs Georges, University of Helsinki

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 4

Decolonising North-South academic partnerships is essential to allow the equitable North-South collaboration needed to generate the knowledge required to tackle global challenges. Advancing equitable North-South academic partnerships requires understanding frameworks and practices that hinder and support partnership development. Based on this premise, this research critically engages with the underexplored temporalities of North-South academic partnerships. The aim is to problematise the hegemony of Global North constructions of time underlying dominant narratives shaping partnership frameworks and objectives. Indeed, it is essential to unveil the false neutrality and universality of Global North temporalities to end the reproduction of unquestioned and problematic patterns that undermine the equity of North-South academic partnerships.

Previous research shows that the elevation of the Global North construction of time that developed with industrialisation and capitalism as a neutral and universal medium and measure played an essential role in the expansion and legitimisation of colonial rule. This construction of time centers clock time as a standardised measurement unit, conceives history as a linear progress towards modernity, and values efficiency as a means to maximise quantifiable outcomes with minimum material, time and human resources spent. Recent scholarship has been devoting increasing attention to coloniality of time, analysing how the dominance of this construction of time, which subjugated and marginalised indigenous temporal systems, persists and continues to shape the way we understand and structure our daily activities, including in academia. In the context of North-South academic partnerships, temporal assumptions influence timelines for joint research and activities, the definition and prioritisation of collaborative goals, and the pacing of project implementation. Yet, the central role of temporality in reinforcing or challenging unequitable power dynamics in North-South academic partnerships is underinvestigated.

Drawing on a qualitative and systematic review of existing literature about the colonisation of time, coloniality of time in academia, and power imbalances in North-South academic partnerships, this study foregrounds and critically analyses the underexplored role of temporal dynamics in North-South academic partnerships. It also maps pathways towards resisting and reimagining hegemonic temporal frameworks that have been highlighted in previous research, and that could constitute starting points to decolonise the temporalities of North-South academic partnerships.

This research demonstrates the crucial need to address the question of time as a limitating and enabling factor in the decolonisation of North-South academic partnerships, identifying starting points for a North-South dialogue aimed at imagining alternative temporalities for equitable academic partnerships.

16:30 - 17:15
POSTER SESSION 3

TOPIC: Enhancing international student experience through student support initiatives: A case study of a comprehensive university
SPEAKERS:
• Takalani Tshililo, University of Venda

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 5

This study explores how student support initiatives shape the academic and social experiences of international students at the University of Venda, a rural comprehensive university in South Africa. Grounded in Tinto’s Theory of Student Integration and Astin’s Theory of Student Involvement, the research examines the extent to which academic and social integration influence international students’ well‑being, retention, and success. Employing a qualitative case study design within an interpretivist paradigm, data were collected from 25 participants comprising current international students, international student alumni, International Relations Office staff, and a Student Representative Council member. Data were generated through open‑ended questionnaires and semi‑structured interviews and analysed thematically. The findings reveal that although various support mechanisms exist, including orientation programmes, social integration activities, psychosocial services, and administrative assistance, their implementation is fragmented, inconsistently delivered, and rarely evaluated. Participants valued peer networks, counselling services, and support from the International Relations Office, particularly regarding visa processing and registration. However, persistent challenges were identified, including visa delays, financial exclusion, language barriers linked to the dominant use of Tshivenda, discrimination, inadequate accommodation support, limited access to funding, and poorly functioning ICT systems. These challenges undermine academic adjustment, social belonging, and overall satisfaction, contributing to declining international student enrolment. The study concludes that international student support at the University of Venda requires a coordinated and integrated institutional response. To address this, a comprehensive university-based framework is proposed, focusing on governance structures, coordinated support mechanisms, language-inclusive practices, digitised administrative systems, enhanced psychosocial support, and systematic monitoring and evaluation. The study contributes to scholarship on internationalisation in historically disadvantaged institutions and offers practical recommendations to enhance international student well‑being, engagement, and academic success.

16:30 - 17:15
POSTER SESSION 4

Sisonke Gala Dinner “We are together”

19:00 - 23:00

REGISTRATION DESK OPEN

07:30 - 13:00

TOPIC: Practicing South–South Internationalization: The Confucius Institute at the University of the Western Cape
SPEAKERS:
Chengwa HU, Confucius Institute at the Unviersity of the Western Cape
• Haofeng Sun, Confucius Institute at the University of the Western Cape
CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 2

Purpose
This contribution aims to share practical insights on how universities in the Global South can implement contextually grounded and equitable internationalization practices. Using the Confucius Institute at the University of the Western Cape (UWC) as a case example, the paper focuses on how language teaching and cultural engagement can be operationalized in ways that support South–South collaboration, institutional agency, and decolonial approaches to internationalization.

Content
The paper will outline how the Confucius Institute at UWC designs and delivers Mandarin language programs and cultural activities within a South African university context shaped by multilingualism, social justice, and transformation. It will highlight concrete practices, including the localization of teaching materials, adaptation of pedagogical approaches to diverse student cohorts, and joint program delivery by Chinese and South African staff. Attention will be given to how these practices are embedded in UWC’s broader internationalization and transformation strategies, rather than operating as stand-alone or externally driven initiatives.

The contribution will also discuss the Confucius Institute’s role in facilitating Africa-led knowledge diplomacy at an operational level. This includes how partnerships are managed, how program priorities are negotiated, and how cultural exchange activities are aligned with institutional and regional needs. The paper will reflect on challenges encountered in practice—such as balancing global partnership expectations with local relevance—and the strategies used to address them.

Expected Outcomes
Participants will gain practical lessons on implementing South–South internationalization initiatives that move beyond symbolic partnerships. The paper will offer actionable insights into curriculum localization, partnership management, and culturally responsive programming that can be adapted by internationalization practitioners working in similar contexts. By focusing on everyday practices rather than policy alone, the contribution aims to support practitioners seeking to design inclusive, impact-oriented internationalization initiatives that are locally meaningful and globally connected.

09:30 - 10:20
PARALLEL SESSION 1

TOPIC: Reimagining Internationalisation in African Universities: Evidence from Woldia University’s Academic Partnerships with South African Institutions
SPEAKERS:
• Mohammed Yimer Tegegne, Woldia University

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 3

Internationalization in higher education has traditionally been influenced by institutions in the Global North, often leading to unequal knowledge production, research collaborations, and academic exchange. To address this, African universities are exploring new strategies that promote fair collaboration, reciprocal learning, and South-South academic partnerships.
This paper investigates how African universities can redefine internationalization through cooperation within the Global South, using Woldia University in Ethiopia and its partnerships with prominent South African universities like the University of Cape Town, University of the Western Cape, and the University of Pretoria as a case study. These collaborations show how African institutions can form partnerships that prioritize shared knowledge creation, academic mobility, joint research, and collaborative seminars.
Based on institutional experiences and partnership initiatives, the paper analyzes how these collaborations enhance capacity building, integrate international perspectives into curricula, and strengthen regional research networks across Africa. The study emphasizes that partnerships among African universities can move past conventional reliance models by fostering mutual understanding, shared intellectual goals, and scholarship relevant to local contexts.
The paper contends that effective internationalization necessitates a move away from North-centric frameworks towards academic cooperation led by Africa and oriented towards the Global South. By offering practical insights from Woldia University’s collaborations with South African institutions, the study demonstrates how universities in the Global South can actively help reshape the agenda of internationalization in higher education.

09:30 - 10:20
PARALLEL SESSION 2

TOPIC: Leveraging AI and Digital Strategies to Advance South-South Mobility:
Towards Equitable and Inclusive Internationalisation in African Higher Education
SPEAKERS:
• Matome Mokoena, Unviersity of Venda
• Mzolisi Payi, Walter Sisulu University

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 4

This paper proposes a transformative, Africa-centred reimagining of international student and staff mobility in higher education, shifting from Global North dependency to equitable, Ubuntu-guided continental solidarity. Its purpose is to counter historical imbalances brain drain, epistemic colonisation, and unequal knowledge flows by advancing actionable frameworks that prioritise intra-African and South-South partnerships, leveraging AI and digital tools for inclusive access while safeguarding data sovereignty.

The content unfolds through conceptual critique and practical strategies. It begins by deconstructing Northern-dominated internationalisation models, drawing on Ndlovu-Gatsheni (2018) on coloniality of power and Zeleza (2020) on “relational sovereignty.” Ubuntu and pluriversality (de Sousa Santos) anchor an ethical foundation rejecting extractive practices. Aligned with DHET Policy (2019), Agenda 2063, and CESA 16–25, it introduces three interconnected frameworks for an “impactful, technology-infused African University”:

African Knowledge Commons (“Internationalise Through Africa”): Accelerates ACQF, joint degrees in AI, climate resilience, and public health to build epistemic unity.

Strategic Global Engagement (“Embed Globally, Act Ethically”): Repositions universities as knowledge diplomats via soft power in COP, WHO, UNESCO; fosters alliances with ASEAN, CELAC, IBSA, and diaspora brain circulation.

Sovereign Digital Futures (“Leverage Technology for Equity”): Deploys AI-driven COIL with vernacular NLP (Lelapa AI, Masakhane, Deep Learning Indaba), solar-powered edge servers, low-bandwidth tutors, and an “Africa Mobility Portal” for rural scholarship matching, ensuring ethical, offline access.

Governance tools include an Internationalisation Quality Dashboard, Ubuntu Research Charter, and audited ethics certification, measuring success via transformative metrics: African-framed theses, equitable co-authorships, zero parachute research, and 100% rural AI penetration not mere MOUs or headcounts.

Expected outcomes are profound: empowered African universities as global knowledge producers; scaled mobility for underserved students; epistemic decolonisation through pluriversal research; and policy influence for DHET, ARUA, PAU. By centring Africa without isolation, this contribution equips leaders to realise “the Africa we want”—a sovereign, innovative higher education ecosystem the world urgently needs.

09:30 - 10:20
PARALLEL SESSION 3

TOPIC: Internationalising the curriculum practice from African intellectual traditions through exploring the indigenous knowledge systems
SPEAKERS:
• Mochina Mphuthi, Central university of Technology

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 5

This paper explores the internationalisation of the curriculum through African intellectual traditions, with particular attention to indigenous knowledge systems, African philosophy and local epistemologies within higher education. While internationalisation has often been shaped by Global North norms and epistemic hierarchies, this study argues that African knowledge traditions offer a legitimate and generative foundation for globally engaged curricula. Drawing on decolonial scholarship and social realism, the paper positions African epistemologies not as alternative add-ons but as knowledge systems capable of shaping curriculum purpose, content and pedagogy in international contexts. Using a qualitative, conceptual approach supported by selected empirical illustrations from teacher education, the paper examines how indigenous knowledge, communal ethics, and relational ways of knowing can inform curriculum design without compromising academic rigour or global relevance. Particular emphasis is placed on how African philosophy, such as Ubuntu, reframes learning as relational, dialogic and socially accountable, thereby challenging individualistic and market-driven models of internationalisation. At the same time, the paper critically reflects on tensions related to legitimacy, assessment and language when local epistemologies enter global academic spaces.The study contributes to current debates on curriculum internationalisation by advancing a model that moves from inclusion towards epistemic justice, where African knowledge systems are recognised as producers of theory rather than sources of cultural content. In doing so, it responds to calls for Global South leadership in redefining internationalisation agendas and offers practical implications for curriculum transformation in higher education institutions seeking to remain globally connected while locally grounded.

09:30 - 10:20
PARALLEL SESSION 4

TOPIC: Reimagining Internationalisation of public administration curricula through global south lens
SPEAKERS:
• Xolisile Ngumbela,Central Unviersity of Technology

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 6

This paper examines how the internationalisation of Public Administration curricula can be re-envisioned through a Global South Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) lens. Traditional Global North frameworks have long shaped the field, influencing pedagogical models, curriculum content, and the direction of research partnerships. However, the 2026 IEASA theme underscores a decisive shift toward Global South authorship, knowledge creation, and epistemic agency. In this context, Public Administration is deeply intertwined with governance, state capacity, and public-sector reforms that require pedagogical models that centre on African governance realities, contextual knowledge systems, and South-driven research priorities. Through a SoTL perspective, this paper argues that meaningful internationalisation must extend beyond mobility to include curriculum redesign, inclusive pedagogies, digital engagement, and collaborative knowledge production that foreground local relevance. Integrating southern epistemologies, multilingual learning approaches, and contextually grounded case studies can enhance the learning experience for Public Administration students while strengthening their ability to address practical governance challenges. Additionally, virtual mobility and South–South academic networks offer equitable, accessible platforms for research collaboration, improving both academic and professional outcomes. The paper concludes that reimagining internationalisation through a Global South SoTL lens enables universities to reclaim ownership of curriculum narratives, advance socially responsive teaching practices, and contribute to broader developmental state objectives. This approach ensures that Public Administration education becomes a critical site for transforming governance knowledge, strengthening institutional capacity, and shaping the next generation of public-sector leaders in Africa and the wider Global South.

09:30 - 10:20
PARALLEL SESSION 5

TOPIC: Shifting the Lens: Rethinking Internationalisation Through African Experiences
SPEAKERS:
• Chrispinus Mkado, ETIO – International Student Barometer
• Orla Quinlan, Rhodes University

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 2

Across Africa, universities are rewriting what internationalisation looks like – and who gets to define it. For too long, the story has been told through someone else’s lens: mobility numbers, ranking positions, and other Global North indicators that say little about how students actually learn, live, and connect on our campuses. If internationalisation is to reflect African priorities, it has to start with African student voices.
This session explores what happens when institutions turn toward those voices as a source of strategy, accountability, and transformation. Drawing on real examples from universities, we will show how structured feedback tools are being used not to chase prestige metrics, but to surface the lived experiences that truly matter: belonging, teaching quality, academic support, safety, integration, employability, and global engagement.
We’ll follow the journeys of institutions using student experience data to challenge long held assumptions, widen who participates in mobility, redesign support structures, and build partnerships that strengthen Global South agency rather than reinforce dependency. In this narrative, data becomes more than numbers: it becomes a lever for equity, a catalyst for innovation, and a guide for Africa led models of internationalisation.
By centring student perspectives, this session invites delegates to imagine – and build – a new internationalisation agenda shaped from the South outward.

10:30 - 11:20
PARALLEL SESSION 6

TOPIC: Networks and networking for early career researchers: Pathways to becoming an established researcher
SPEAKERS:
• Moloko Mathipa-Mdakane, National Research Foundation
• Michael Nxumalo, The National Research Foundation
• Helin Backman Kartal, Uppsala University

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 3

His parallel session explores how research networks and networking practices can play a transformative role in supporting early career researchers (ECRs) as they transition into established researchers, with a particular emphasis on strengthening and sustaining the research pipeline. In contemporary higher education and research systems, success is increasingly shaped not only by individual academic excellence, but also by the ability to access, participate in, and contribute meaningfully to collaborative networks. As such, networks have become central to research visibility, leadership development, funding access, and long-term scholarly sustainability.
The session is grounded in the recognition that research careers are no longer linear or individually driven trajectories. Instead, they are shaped by complex ecosystems of collaboration that include universities, funding agencies, research councils, and disciplinary or thematic networks. Within this context, structured and intentional networking is emerging as a critical mechanism for enabling ECRs to build research profiles, develop leadership capacity, and secure opportunities for advancement within increasingly competitive and globalised research environments.
Bringing together representatives from national funding bodies, university-based research networks, and institutional research management offices, the panel will offer a systems-level perspective on how networks are designed, supported, and sustained across different parts of the research ecosystem. This multi-stakeholder composition will allow for a nuanced exploration of how different actors contribute to shaping opportunities for ECR engagement. Funders will reflect on how research programmes and grants are structured to incentivise collaboration and leadership development. University representatives will discuss how institutions facilitate access to national and international networks, while research offices will highlight the practical support provided to ECRs in navigating funding landscapes, partnerships, and collaborative projects.
The discussion will be guided by three key thematic areas. First, the panel will consider how networks support the progression of ECRs into leadership and agenda-setting roles within their respective disciplines and fields. This includes examining how exposure to collaborative environments enables ECRs to move beyond individual project work and begin to shape research priorities, contribute to consortiums, and participate in strategic research initiatives.
Second, the session will explore the role of institutions and funding bodies in creating equitable and sustainable networking opportunities. Particular attention will be given to questions of access, inclusion, and structural inequality, including how emerging researchers from under-resourced institutions or marginalised backgrounds can be meaningfully integrated into high-level research networks. The panel will reflect on existing models of support and identify gaps that may limit equitable participation.
Third, the discussion will focus on practical strategies that ECRs can use to engage effectively in networks and partnerships. This includes building professional relationships, identifying suitable collaborative opportunities, leveraging institutional support structures, and positioning themselves strategically within disciplinary and interdisciplinary research communities.
Audience engagement will form an integral part of the session, with moderated questions and interactive prompts designed to draw on the lived experiences of ECRs and institutional stakeholders. This participatory approach will ensure that the discussion is grounded in real-world challenges and opportunities faced by researchers at different stages of their careers.
The expected outcome of the session is to develop a shared understanding of how research networks can be strengthened as a deliberate component of research system development. The panel aims to generate practical recommendations for funders, universities, and research management offices on how to design, resource, and sustain networks that prioritise meaningful ECR participation and leadership development. In addition, the session will provide ECRs with actionable insights into how to engage strategically within networks, build collaborative relationships, and position themselves for progression toward established researcher status.
Ultimately, the session argues that investing in robust, inclusive, and well-supported research networks is not only essential for individual academic career development, but is also critical for building resilient, innovative, and impactful research systems capable of addressing complex societal challenges.

10:30 - 11:20
PARALLEL SESSION 7

TOPIC: TBC
SPEAKERS: TBC
CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 4

10:30 - 11:20
PARALLEL SESSION 8

TOPIC: Rewriting Internationalisation in a Time of Immigration Tensions: A Dialogue for Higher Education Internationalisation Practitioners
SPEAKERS:
• Khwezi Bonani, University of the Western Cape

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 5

South African higher education institutions occupy a complex position within the Global South. While universities actively pursue continental partnerships and student mobility to strengthen South–South collaboration, they operate within a domestic context increasingly marked by public anxiety about immigration and access to public services. Public discourse and civic activism, including movements such as Operation Dudula, together with policy debates around immigration management led by the Department of Home Affairs, have brought tensions around the presence of foreign nationals (especially Africans) into sharper focus. These debates are particularly visible in sectors such as healthcare and education where questions of access and resource allocation are often contested. These dynamics inevitably intersect with universities’ internationalisation agendas, especially as institutions seek to expand inbound mobility from across the African continent.

This thought-piece session invites colleagues to engage in an open dialogue about what is often the “elephant in the room”: how institutions balance commitments to African collaboration and South–South mobility with rising societal tensions toward migrants. Situated within broader continental aspirations for regional integration and mobility, the session reflects on the responsibilities of higher education institutions as both global and local actors.

Rather than presenting definitive answers, the session will surface key themes for collective reflection. These include navigating the tension between internationalisation ambitions and domestic socio-political pressures; managing administrative and visa constraints that affect academic mobility; addressing perceptions of competition for institutional resources; and examining whether current student support systems adequately foster inclusion and belonging for foreign African students.

By facilitating dialogue among higher education practitioners, the session aims to interrogate whether existing institutional practices enable inclusive mobility ecosystems or inadvertently reproduce broader societal tensions, contributing to efforts to rethink internationalisation through a more reflexive and equitable Global South lens.

10:30 - 11:20
PARALLEL SESSION 9

TOPIC: Rethinking Internationalisation in the Global South: Lessons from Student Experiences at the Margins
SPEAKERS:
• Nonnie Falala, University of Cape Town

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 6

This presentation is based on institutional practice and real case experiences from a South African university. The aim is to contribute practical insight into how Global South institutions are responding to emerging forms of student mobility linked to displacement and legal precarity, and how these experiences are reshaping institutional approaches to internationalisation.

10:30 - 11:20
PARALLEL SESSION 10

Phola & Connect “Refreshment Break”

11:20 - 11:50

TOPIC: Design Thinking and Co-Creation for Technology Commercialisation: A Global South Innovation Model from Zimbabwe
SPEAKERS:
• Joshua Simuka, Harare Institute of Technology
• Quinton C Kanhukamwe, Harare Institute of Technology

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 2

This presentation proposes a Global South–driven innovation model that demonstrates how African universities can generate locally grounded yet globally relevant solutions through design thinking and co-creation. The contribution explores how innovation ecosystems in the Global South can move beyond imitation of Northern models and instead develop contextually appropriate frameworks for addressing complex societal challenges.

Purpose
The purpose of this contribution is to illustrate how design thinking and co-creation approaches can strengthen research commercialisation and innovation outcomes within Global South universities. The presentation argues that while many innovation models originate from the Global North, universities in Africa and other parts of the Global South possess unique contextual knowledge, resource-constrained creativity, and community-embedded perspectives that can produce distinctive and scalable solutions to global challenges such as food security, climate resilience, digital inclusion, and sustainable urban development.

Content
The presentation will introduce a conceptual and practical framework that integrates design thinking, frugal innovation, and stakeholder co-creation within university innovation systems. First, it will discuss the limitations of traditional linear research commercialisation models that prioritise technology transfer without sufficient engagement with societal needs. Second, it will present the principles of design thinking such as empathy, ideation, prototyping and testing as mechanisms for aligning research outputs with real-world problems. Third, it will demonstrate how co-creation involving universities, industry, communities, and policymakers can accelerate innovation adoption and technology commercialisation. Using examples from African higher education institutions, particularly Zimbabwe, the presentation will illustrate how interdisciplinary collaboration and community-driven innovation can generate impactful solutions that respond directly to local development priorities while contributing to global knowledge systems.

Expected Outcomes
The proposed contribution aims to generate three outcomes. First, it will provide a practical innovation framework for Global South universities seeking to strengthen technology commercialisation through participatory design approaches. Second, it will highlight Africa’s role as a producer of knowledge and innovation, rather than merely a recipient of externally generated models. Third, it will stimulate dialogue among conference participants on building South-South innovation networks and collaborative research ecosystems that address shared global challenges through locally grounded solutions.

Ultimately, the presentation contributes to the broader conference theme by demonstrating how Global South institutions can rewrite the agenda of internationalisation through innovation leadership, co-creation, and socially responsive research.

11:50 - 12:40
PARALLEL SESSION 11

TOPIC: Internationalising a Rural Branch Campus: A University of the Free State Qwaqwa Campus Case Study
SPEAKERS:
• Mojalefa Mthembu, University of the Free State

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 3

The purpose of this presentation is to share practical insights on how internationalisation can be implemented at a rural branch campus where traditional mobility opportunities are limited. While internationalisation in higher education is often associated with large universities that have strong international networks and significant student mobility, many rural and branch campuses operate under different conditions. These campuses often have fewer resources, limited visibility in global networks and smaller international student populations. Despite these constraints, they remain important spaces for expanding access to global engagement for students who may otherwise have limited exposure to international experiences.

This presentation focuses on the case of the University of the Free State (UFS) Qwaqwa Campus and reflects on initiatives implemented through the Office for International Affairs to strengthen internationalisation at the campus. The presentation will outline several initiatives that aim to build an international environment within the local campus context. These include the Global Ambassador programme, intercultural engagement activities between local and international students, residence-based discussions and events, and partnerships with international institutions. Particular attention will be given to how these initiatives support internationalisation at home by creating opportunities for students to interact across cultures, share experiences and develop intercultural awareness without necessarily travelling abroad.

The presentation will also reflect on the challenges and opportunities associated with internationalising a rural campus. These include issues such as limited mobility opportunities, geographic location and the need to design programmes that are inclusive and accessible to all students.

The expected outcome of this contribution is to provide a practical example of how internationalisation can be approached in contexts that differ from large metropolitan institutions. By sharing the experience of the Qwaqwa Campus, the presentation aims to contribute to discussions on developing more inclusive and contextually relevant models of internationalisation within the Global South. It also hopes to encourage dialogue among institutions that are working to expand global engagement opportunities for students in similar contexts.

11:50 - 12:40
PARALLEL SESSION 12

TOPIC: Rewriting the Admissions Agenda: Internationalisation-at-Home Through Socially Accountable Selection in a Rural South African Health Sciences Faculty (2026 Intake Case Study)
SPEAKERS:
• Mzukisi Kolosa, Walter Sisulu University
• Zolisa Ntozakhe, Walter Sisulu University

CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 4

Ethical and governance considerations: Although the session uses an institutional admissions dataset, the presentation will be limited to aggregated, de-identified patterns and a policy/criteria audit. No personally identifiable information will be shared, and the student–applicant advisory component will be conducted with explicit consent and clear role boundaries.

Session design and logistics: The case study is well-suited to a highly interactive format (short presentation plus guided application). If possible, a room setup that enables small-group discussion (or breakaway space) and basic projection would support a practical “take-home toolkit” engagement.

11:50 - 12:40
PARALLEL SESSION 13

TOPIC: TBC
SPEAKERS: TBC
CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 5

11:50 - 12:40
PARALLEL SESSION 14

TOPIC: It’s been real: Reflections and the road ahead
SPEAKERS: TBC
CHAIRPERSON: TBC
VENUE: Conference Room 1

13:00 - 14:00
CLOSING PLENARY

Official Announcement: 29th IEASA Annual Conference 2027

14:00 - 14:15

Hamba Kahle Farewell Lunch “Go well”

14:15 - 16:00